Revenue intelligence Beta

Clarity for every conversion decision.

Prescriptive scoring trained on your pipeline, not industry benchmarks. Every score tells your reps which accounts to prioritize, when to engage, and why.

Right company · Right person · Right time, answered separately

Model dashboard

A real model. A public dataset. Honest numbers.

The UCI Bank Marketing dataset is a standard public ML benchmark. 36,168 records, 11.7% baseline conversion rate. Here's what ax1om trained on it in 88 seconds: 0.80 AUC, 3.14x lift on the top decile, and a Feature Stability Score on every field so you know which signals hold up when the model retrains.

ax1om model performance dashboard showing AUC-ROC 0.8026, 3.14x lift at top 20%, 36.7% precision, lift curve by decile, score distribution histogram, and feature analysis table with SHAP impact and Feature Stability Score columns
Trained on the public UCI Bank Marketing dataset · 36,168 records · 53 features · 88 seconds
Explainability

Every score comes with a reason.

SHAP feature importances on every field, Feature Stability Scores that tell you which signals survive retraining, and natural language insights that translate model output into operator decisions.

Feature analysis table showing SHAP impact, splits, Feature Stability Score, and expandable field-level breakdowns for Industry, Title, LeadSource, and NumberOfEmployees
SHAP feature importances with per-value breakdowns and Feature Stability Scores
Key insights panel showing natural language findings: VP Sales titles convert 2.6x higher, VP titles convert 2.4x higher, revenue titles convert 2.3x higher
Natural language insights derived from the trained model
Three questions

Most scoring tools collapse three different questions into one number.

ax1om answers them separately.

01

Right company

ICP fit score at the account level. Which companies match the profile of your best customers?

02

Right person

Contact prioritization. Within a qualified account, which individuals are worth your team's time?

03

Right time

In-market timing. Is this account showing signals that they're ready to buy now, or should you wait?


01 / How it works

Three steps to scores your reps actually trust.

Step 01

Connect your CRM

Secure OAuth connection to Salesforce, HubSpot, or upload CSVs. ax1om never stores CRM credentials.

Step 02

Train on your pipeline

ax1om trains a dedicated model on your closed-won and lost history. No cross-customer data, no shared models.

Step 03

Write scores back to CRM

Predictions and explanations land directly on Lead and Account records. SHAP values show exactly why.


Backed by enterprise-grade infrastructure

ax1om runs on providers that hold independent SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27018, and PCI DSS Level 1 certifications. Our own SOC 2 Type II audit begins Q4 2026.

  • Google Cloud
    SOC 2 Type II · ISO 27001 · ISO 27018
  • Supabase
    SOC 2 Type II
  • Vercel
    SOC 2 Type II · ISO 27001
  • Cloudflare
    SOC 2 Type II · ISO 27001
  • Stripe
    SOC 2 Type II · PCI DSS L1
  • Sentry
    SOC 2 Type II
ax1om compliance
  • SOC 2 Type II Audit Q4 2026
  • GDPR DPA with SCCs available
  • CCPA Compliant as service provider
  • US data residency GCP us-central1 only

Common questions

What teams ask before they start.

We already have Einstein / HubSpot scoring.

Those tools are trained on general patterns across their entire customer base, not on your closed-won outcomes. ax1om trains on your history, so the score reflects your conversion patterns, not an industry average.

We're not big enough for this.

ax1om is specifically built for Series A-C companies. The guided setup works with as few as 50 closed-won opportunities using TabPFN. You don't need years of CRM history, and the model improves as your data grows.

Our RevOps team doesn't have data science resources.

That's the point. ax1om handles the entire ML pipeline: feature engineering, model training, scoring, CRM writeback, and weekly retraining. No code, no notebooks, no data science expertise required.

How is this different from a spreadsheet scoring model?

A spreadsheet model uses weights someone guessed. ax1om uses weights the data determined, specifically your closed-won outcomes. The difference shows up in the accounts that surprise you: the ones that score high because they match a pattern your team never articulated.


Get started

Ready to see your own pipeline, not someone else's benchmark?